Thursday, July 13, 2006

Brown Brothers Tempranillo 2003




Brown Brothers Tempranillo 2003 (Victoria)

The better-half (oh, how I pine for the days when I could refer to her as the 'leader of the opposition' and get away with it - those days ended when one of you blabbed and told my darling wife about my blog) prepared a sensational roast chicken meal this evening. (I will get back to giving recipes and showing photos in the near future).

I thought this would be the perfect opportunity to road-test the Brown Brothers Tempranillo 2003. Again, this is a variety of which I know little and have tasted less than that. The bottle says to drink within 3-5 years of the vintage date and that it was good with roast chicken, so it got the call up. This was one of the wines from the Wine Society which I promised to review.

I found the Tempranillo to be surprising. My first impressions were of a slightly darker than ruby red wine that was simple and not very aromatic and with no complexity. However, after about 30 minutes the wine opened slightly to one that was somewhat aromatic and smelled of berries and maybe a hint of black pepper, which would indicate a touch of richness. It was not a particularly complex wine but not as simple as I originally thought. It was well balanced and had soft tannins.

At the risk of inflaming the debate that still continues in my post of 7 July (about wine scoring systems - some are debating the masses and you could say they were good mass debators - an old pun but still a goodie), I tried to evaluate this wine in two ways. Firstly I tried to provide an overall 100 point score without assessing the various components of the wine and I came up with

80-85/100

which on the Robert Parker scale is somewhere between barely above average (80) to half-way between above average and very good (85).

I then used the Wine Values Card (at item 4) in the article by Brian Jefferies on Torb's site to score all the individual attributes and came up with:

Appearance (2 + 1) = 3

Nose (2 + 3) = 5

Palate (1.5 + 2 + 3 + 1.5) = 8

TOTAL 16/20

which on the Jancis Robinson scale is 'just above average but distinguished'

These two scores - one by my general impressions of the wine after taking into account aromas, taste, balance, appearance, length etc - and the other by scoring the individual characteristics have landed me in almost the same position. Mind you, one swallow (geddit?) does not make a summer, and this could have been pure luck - especially when you consider that I am not an expert on wine, I have no real experience with Tempranillo etc - however I don't think so.

Most importantly - did I like the wine? - Yes I did (I wouldn't kick it out of bed ...)! Would I buy it again? - purely depends on the price.


(Many thanks to Catherine Hill from Brown Brothers for the photo and the kind permisson to use it)






9 Comments:

Blogger Tannia said...

My former "better half" (and it will be obvious why he's former and not current in just a second)...used to refer to me as "the Minister for War" or "She Who Must Be Obeyed"....I'm not sure why. I just called him MOTH (Man of the House) absolutely no reference whatsoever to the fact that he was a stout little insect with a liking for nocturnal activity!

I loved this review. There was something in it for everyone - even the "L" plater like me.

I got a graet idea about the wine from your description and for those that like numbers "meh" they were there as well :)

*chink*

well done :)

7:55 AM  
Anonymous The Wine Commonsewer said...

Tannia, you funny.

Tempranillo is tricky. Sometimes good sometimes a clinker. Chilean and Spanish Tempranillos seem to give me a good dose of allergens. Couple of glasses and I wake up feeling like I have a cold.

10:34 AM  
Blogger Mal said...

Thanks for the comments!

Tannia, you ARE funny - quite an enjoyably wicked sense of humour!

TWC - I have only ever tried Tempranillo once before and was totally underwhelmed on that occasion. In fact until a few months ago I had never heard of Tempranillo - so to date have not found any allergies to it but am willing to continue testing - just to make sure.

5:44 PM  
Blogger Tannia said...

testing, testing and more testing..that's the way.....I like the idea!

Oh and you have to laugh....otherwise life would be unbearable now wouldn't it?

11:13 PM  
Anonymous The Wine Commonsewer said...

When I checked to make sure the link worked in preview, Microsoft decided that it was too much of a security risk to allow me to click back to the preview page and told me so. Idiots. Usually I use Firefox but I just happened to use IE this time. Now, I have to re-write my post.

3:02 AM  
Anonymous The Wine Commonsewer said...

Let's try this again.

Tempranillo isn't my favorite either.

However, This is a pretty decent Tempranillo.

I really shouldn't be here, I am supposed to be working on this hot Sunday morning. Nobody did any of my work while I was on holiday, which is a risk of self-employment I suppose. Yes, I'll have some cheese with that whine. :-)

3:05 AM  
Anonymous TWC said...

Another good Tempranillo here

2:42 PM  
Blogger Mal said...

TWC

It is good to see there actually is some good Tempranillo out there and people that enjoy it - especially for $10. Thanks!

I was also greatly heartened to read your comments on the Zorro moive - a totally underwhelming movie.

7:15 PM  
Anonymous The Wine Commonsewer said...

Hey Mal, thanks for visiting TWC. Glad you agree with my characterization of that awful Zorro movie.

2:15 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Site Feed
Enter your Email and receive the latest posts immediately


Powered by FeedBlitz